18/10/2011 13:36
Erbil, October 18 / October (Rn) - The Second Vice-President of the Iraqi Council of Representatives, that the war would break out between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq, despite being the list but invisible, pointing to the existence of weights broke out of the war between Kurds and Arabs as well. stressed Aref Tayfur during the interview following the interview with the correspondent of the News Agency of Kurdistan (Rn) during his visit to Dar Al Aras for printing and publishing in Arbil, the "Sunni Arabs in Iraq has not come forward with any initiative for an alliance with the Kurds and the alliance of the latter with Shia comes from the fact that it's the best." * What are the existing problems between the Erbil, Baghdad, and that appear to the surface now and then? - those problems appear when the two sides reach agreement on a specific mechanism and programs for implementation, to witness the next day shirk the Iraqi side of this agreement, but the option in front of the Kurds is to continue to strive to reach new agreements. * where to turn the situation in Iraq and the region? - The situation in Iraq a year of further deterioration, especially among Shiites, Sunnis and the relations between the Kurds and the Iraqi parties deteriorated, comes in when trying year to win the Kurds on their side, but not in respect of matters and issues crucial , and I think the draft U.S. Vice President Joe Biden on the division of Iraq into three federal regions Sabesr light. * Masilv can be weighted in the policy, but the question is: Will those conditions to the war in Iraq? - I think that the war would break out between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq, a list now, but invisible, as there are weights broke out of the war between Kurds and Arabs, which is on its way to us. * There is a sense continuous with the Kurds exclusion of thermoplastic Iraqi side, so the likely emergence of similar situations as witnessed in Khanaqin to Maliki's decision? - was can the Kurds to prevent exclusion in Baghdad by insisting on their demands since the beginning, but they did not and it is difficult for the Kurds to prevent it, and thought chauvinist and Saddam are still influential in Iraq, along with the fact that the majority in Iraq does not support the demands of the Kurds, while can not be certain that five deputies in favor of the Kurdish issue in the Iraqi parliament. * what could be called the Kurds in the Iraqi parliament, whether they are a powerful force or warriors Ssayasaon or Msoton? - Kurds represent the second national in Iraq and must deputies in Baghdad to act on that basis, as it is not possible for the Kurds to achieve something that they were posing as voting in the House of Representatives, and I think the Kurds are more influential in the first session of the Council and they have members of the most efficient in the House of Representatives. * During the past few days visited the Kurdish figures fillet in Baghdad House Aras and complained of not giving them positions of share of the Kurds in Baghdad, what is your response? - the right of the Kurds Faili complaint, it is the legal been done to them such as restoring sexual and consider their case of genocide, but on the other hand are not interest them the required level with the Kurdistan appointed 280 Kurds in Baghdad, 150 of them of Faili Kurds, and yet they went and they allied with the Shiite parties and abandoned the PKK, which overlooked them in order to preserve the Kurdish unity. * Kurdish parties always emphasize the good things in times of crisis, as happened when passing the Law of the Iraqi parliamentary elections, which he said the PKK that he had received promises of U.S. implementation of the Article 140 return, which has not yet been achieved, which repeats with agreements Erbil, too, but all the outstanding problems between Baghdad and Erbil are still the same, why? - in front of about Article 140, the Americans say it is a matter internal Iraqi, while they prevented the return of the disputed areas between Arbil and Baghdad to the region when it demanded the Kurdish side after the fall of the former Iraqi regime in 2003 out of those areas after the determination of the first to impose a fait accompli in and return to Kurdistan. The Mi_khas agreement Erbil It includes 18 points among Kurds The Islamic Supreme Council of the hand and 22 points between the Kurds and the National Alliance on the other hand, although they expressed over and over again their willingness to implement those points, but they stipulate promised the Kurds to remain part of Iraq, with regard to census, the node lies in the rejection of the province of Nineveh to the conduct alleged subordination of districts and the areas (Akre, Shekhan and Alvaidh and drunk) with while Erbil is conducted exclusively and numbering them. On the issue of oil and gas law, the Iraqi is brought the situation to what it is now because they have fallen somewhat under the pressure of Shiite parties from voting in favor of oil and gas law the past and put forward a number of members of the House of Representatives, in turn, referred the Iraqi Council of Ministers a project alternative to the House measure of Maliki's adviser for Energy and Electricity Minister acting Hussein al-Shahristani, the current bill to the House of Representatives detriment of interests of the Kurdish far. * where to turn the current situation in Iraq after the visit of the delegation, Kurdish politician to Baghdad? - the situation in Iraq needs a lot of time to get better because the problems are too many, and that al-Maliki had assured to expedite the implementation of Article 140 of the disputed areas, but the events that followed his decision lowered the flag of Kurdistan for government departments in Khanaqin prevented the implementation of his instructions as required. * How long will the Kurds optimistic about the situation in Iraq, while al-Maliki issued his decision lowered the flag of Kurdistan, days after the delegation's visit to Baghdad, the Kurdish politician? - I do not want to defend al-Maliki, but that the response towards the Kurds his decision to take down the flag of Kurdistan from the government departments in Khanaqin was below the required level and Aasahm in solving the current problems, especially if we are to continue in Iraq. * a lot recently to talk about a Kurdish state, could the Kurds taking that step, and do will be a solution? - Declaration of a Kurdish state would be a solution, but the requirement of approval of Turkey because it is an important element in the Kurdish issue other than Iran, which is consistent with any situation Mostagd, I prefer to solve problems with Iraq and continue at the present time. Q: Do you suggest the stability of the situation in Baghdad? - I do not expect this, as I most likely a further splits in Iraq which is not good, and that the Shiites are turning towards the split, although the reference does not allow them to hard-line alliance. * increased in the recent calls for Sunnis to form a territory of their own, how serious those calls ? - I do not think it serious, but that in case of increased pressure on them more than it is now could do that step. Open: Sarbaz Saleh, see: Aso Haji
http://www.aknews.com/ar/aknews/9/267751/
