Follow us! Follow us!

America is not afraid of Iran in the Gulf!

From Reputable News Sources

America is not afraid of Iran in the Gulf!

Unread postby admin » Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:48 am

America is not afraid of Iran in the Gulf!

Date: Thursday, 30/08/2012 01:31 pm

Sarkis Naoum
Nahar newspaper Lebanon
Thursday 30/8/2012 votes "clap" Swords of the Islamic Republic of Iran hear well in the Middle East, but in the whole world. They do not stop the threat, almost daily, to destroy its enemies, led by the United States and Israel, especially if military launched a war, or if targeted military operation of its nuclear facilities and possibly diverse infrastructure. They do not stop and on aregular basis for the announcement of important achievements in the field of military industry. By day appear sophisticated new missiles. The days appear new types of missiles. The days appear weapons freely ... To another is as simple as successes. But all that, in the opinion of Western diplomatic sources well-informed, not to scare Americans. They consider it a serious signal to a deep sense of when the Iranians are concerned that Israel might do against military action, or what America might do. Perhaps the biggest source of concern in this period is to strengthen America's military presence sea in the Gulf and send more warships to the region. It is at the same time said naval force stationed in places close to the Strait of Hormuz, threatening Iran always close, or adjacent to it. The concentration will be completed mid-September next. Of course, Iranian officials tried to respond to "Armada" American introduced last Naval War industries such as speed boats capable of inflicting great harm American warships. But the Americans did not remain silent, they replied they declare their ability to treat all bombed by Iran ships, but to destroy it, and certainly they can afford some losses that may acquire in the course of the battle. on what stops resolution, on the work that must be done against Iran, especially after the failure of talks "nuclear" that interview with G-6 +1, and after detecting international destinations Several international organizations also said Iran has increased the production of highly enriched uranium of about 20 percent or maybe more than them? stop this resolution, answering Western diplomatic sources vast viewed itself , on Israel. The discussion about Iran and a military strike its nuclear facilities department at all levels, and within government departments, parliamentary and political, diplomatic and military ... It is the declared positions shows clearly that senior retired officers of the army and others are still in active service and the heads of intelligence agencies oppose a military strike unless involving the United States. They know that the decision facing the President of the government of Benjamin Netanyahu is not easy, and for several reasons. First, knowledge that Nfradehm military strike might affect Iran's nuclear facilities damaged important, but it definitely will not disrupt or destroy these facilities as a whole, and especially after distributed to several regions of the country, and after becoming an underground and in a manner reduces opportunities destroying bombs dropped by her. Second, that the Iranians continue to increase the production of highly enriched uranium will enable them to acquire the amount of crude it enough to make four or five nuclear bombs. Note that they need and although the situation cited another year to manufacture weapons. This drives the Israelis to the conviction that followed waiting makes military mission in the future more difficult. Third, their knowledge that Nfradehm implementing a military strike, especially during the next two months will create a financial crisis and global economic. No one knows the impact on the U.S. presidential elections near, everyone except to know that the current president and rival Sajaddan themselves obliged to help Israel if needed to do so. The fourth reason is the knowledge Netanyahu to postpone the strike to Iran until after the U.S. presidential elections and the election of Republican Mitt Romney as President instead of Obama Sadjalana wait at least an additional year before thinking about setting a date for implementation. Romney and despite his friendship with Israel and the President of the Government is obliged to at least a year to install his feet and to make critical decisions on thorny issues. Knowing that he would face significant opposition to the decision to strike Iran or endorsement by hitting Israel. They are both at the U.S. military or when intelligence agencies or some of them. What does that mean? means that the current case is full of dangers and uncertainty, which makes the rate of implementation Israeli military strike on Iran soon does not exceed 50 percent.
Source: almowatennews
If its not on Iraqi Dinar Chat...It's probably crap!
User avatar
admin
Site Owner
Site Owner
 
Posts: 23542
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 11:26 am

Return to Iraqi News & Misc Info

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

cron