Al-Maliki Delivers a speech in the Congress (the Democrats)
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 10:35 amAl-Maliki Delivers a speech in the Congress (the Democrats) rather than Obama?!
Al-Maliki Delivers a speech in the Congress (the Democrats) rather than Obama?!
Palm-while the US army continues to complete his plans for withdrawal of Iraq, where total is expected to leave 33 troops by the end of this year, there are still questions about US policy in Iraq وتبعاتها pages and opinion articles in the US newspapers different points of view on a daily basis on the next stage of the Iraqi-US, but it would be on the Iraqi leaders and the Americans to clarify these relations, and this is what سيتطلع to the US president, Barack Obama, when received by Prime Minister nouri Al-Maliki in the White House next month.
The White House spokesman said Karni here yesterday that President Obama is looking forward to welcoming the president of Iraqi Prime Minister nouri Al-Maliki at the White House on 12 December, noting that ” the two leaders will hold talks on deepening the comprehensive strategic partnership between the United States and Iraq, explaining that the president appreciates the sacrifices and achievements of all those who served in Iraq. Which allowed the arrival of this moment-promises US-Iraqi Friendship permanently.
Al-Maliki’s Visit will be an opportunity for Obama to show their commitment to Iraq by working on “the Strategic Framework Agreement” between the two countries and expand relations outside the military cooperation of the two countries will also visit important denied the allegations that the United States is no longer bound to Iraq’s stability, to leave the country, the influence of Saudi.
The writer says political analyst ammar al Baghdadi that President Al-Maliki and nothing else is will reap the fruits of the US withdrawal from Iraq, despite the fact that all political forces wanted to (intolerance) the issue of التديد or no extension. Immunity or اللاحصانة trainers at the top of the prime minister.
Al-Baghdadi Said in a media statement: that the state of political fighting dominating the Iraqi scene behind the non-extension of the US forces or the granting of immunity for trainers Americans, despite the fact that the Iraqi political forces, almost agree on the need for, in all respects, especially from the point of view of security, but it does not تجاهر so only in special boards, and when will these blocs in the ball in the court of the prime minister, according to Al Baghdadi, the latter had no choice but استمزاج the bloc leaders were meeting in the home of President Talabani.
Al-Baghdadi Is likely to be prime minister, Nouri Al-Maliki, to receive full and unprecedented by President Barack Obama, expected to deliver Al-Maliki after his meeting with President Obama an important speech in the Congress with the Republican majority willing to extend to the US forces, could be considered as a speech (the victory) on behalf.
Al-Baghdadi Is drawn to that serious withdrawal of US forces from Iraq organized towards bases in the Arabian Gulf, is a major victory للرئيسيين Obama, Al-Maliki, stressing that the orderly withdrawal would enable Obama-a lot of papers in preparation for a second term of office for the Democrats.
In the meantime, defended a former member of the US National Security Council (ماكغورك the policy of Obama in an article published by “Washington Post” yesterday, saying: If we said things in the right way, this new phase may be more important than the withdrawal of the US troops, adding that this is not the end but the beginning of Iraq “, which will allow and normal relations between the two countries.
However, right-wing analyst Charles كراثومر said that Obama “failure” in the negotiations with the Iraqis to keep us forces in Iraq, he said in an article published by the view that Obama failed in particular “diplomatic” make the Iraqi government is willing to keep the US forces, which may result in خسارتنا of Iraq reflects the view كراثومر the opinion of many Republicans in the first place and supporters of the war in Iraq that the failure to keep us forces in Iraq, I mean, the US influence in Baghdad or to the region.
It is, without doubt, Obama, the decision to withdraw troops from Iraq was based in part on its accounts in preparation for next year’s presidential elections, especially that he promised to complete withdrawal of US forces from the country. However, the Iraqi position that refuses to give us soldiers immunity was in the end an essential not to keep military forces after the expiry of the agreement, “the US forces” in Iraq by the end of this year, which included immunity to the US forces.
Of course, the Iranian role in Iraq one of the most prominent issues that concern Americans in Iraqi-US evaluation of the relations, and this is what is Republicans, was 10 members of the Republican senators, led by the senior member of the Armed Forces Committee in the council, John McCain, sent a letter demanding to ask Obama about his decision he said the members of the upper house of parliament that withdrawal from Iraq would be seen our enemies in the Middle East, especially the Iranian regime, a strategic victory.
But officials in the US Administration does not consider the decision a victory for the neighboring countries said an official in US Department of State to “asharq Al-Awsat” that the Iraqis have proved that they do not want to interfere in Iran’s affairs, even if they are good their relations with Iran, adding there is no vacuum in Iraq because the Iraqis themselves to fill the political and military area and for his part, said the writer in “Time” magazine that the invasion of Iraq, and not leaving, in the form of a “gift” for the neighbouring countries.
Political views are reflected on perceptions of the American people on Iraq shows a poll, conducted by the Institute of “galob” this week that 75 percent of Americans support Obama’s decision to pull out of Iraq, as opposed to 21 per cent of the poll showed that 96 percent of Democrats support withdrawal from Iraq by the end of this year while 77 per cent of independents support this policy, but it is noticeable is that only 43 per cent of Republicans support withdrawal, despite the fact that the former US President George W. Bush’s Republican is the one who signed this agreement. And 52 percent of Republicans involved in the opposition for withdrawal from Iraq.
He warned the executive director of the Institute of Strategic and International Studies in the United States, Andrew باراسليتي, abuse of the consequences of the end of the war in Iraq, especially with regard to Iraq and added: We have to give the Iraqis the right, to self-determination on the basis of the Iraqi interior ministry policy, he said that the failure to reach agreement on an extension of the US forces will remain in Iraq resulted from Baghdad, not Washington, Iraq enjoying freedom now have choices.
http://bit.ly/uRYk8W
Al-Maliki Delivers a speech in the Congress (the Democrats) rather than Obama?!
Palm-while the US army continues to complete his plans for withdrawal of Iraq, where total is expected to leave 33 troops by the end of this year, there are still questions about US policy in Iraq وتبعاتها pages and opinion articles in the US newspapers different points of view on a daily basis on the next stage of the Iraqi-US, but it would be on the Iraqi leaders and the Americans to clarify these relations, and this is what سيتطلع to the US president, Barack Obama, when received by Prime Minister nouri Al-Maliki in the White House next month.
The White House spokesman said Karni here yesterday that President Obama is looking forward to welcoming the president of Iraqi Prime Minister nouri Al-Maliki at the White House on 12 December, noting that ” the two leaders will hold talks on deepening the comprehensive strategic partnership between the United States and Iraq, explaining that the president appreciates the sacrifices and achievements of all those who served in Iraq. Which allowed the arrival of this moment-promises US-Iraqi Friendship permanently.
Al-Maliki’s Visit will be an opportunity for Obama to show their commitment to Iraq by working on “the Strategic Framework Agreement” between the two countries and expand relations outside the military cooperation of the two countries will also visit important denied the allegations that the United States is no longer bound to Iraq’s stability, to leave the country, the influence of Saudi.
The writer says political analyst ammar al Baghdadi that President Al-Maliki and nothing else is will reap the fruits of the US withdrawal from Iraq, despite the fact that all political forces wanted to (intolerance) the issue of التديد or no extension. Immunity or اللاحصانة trainers at the top of the prime minister.
Al-Baghdadi Said in a media statement: that the state of political fighting dominating the Iraqi scene behind the non-extension of the US forces or the granting of immunity for trainers Americans, despite the fact that the Iraqi political forces, almost agree on the need for, in all respects, especially from the point of view of security, but it does not تجاهر so only in special boards, and when will these blocs in the ball in the court of the prime minister, according to Al Baghdadi, the latter had no choice but استمزاج the bloc leaders were meeting in the home of President Talabani.
Al-Baghdadi Is likely to be prime minister, Nouri Al-Maliki, to receive full and unprecedented by President Barack Obama, expected to deliver Al-Maliki after his meeting with President Obama an important speech in the Congress with the Republican majority willing to extend to the US forces, could be considered as a speech (the victory) on behalf.
Al-Baghdadi Is drawn to that serious withdrawal of US forces from Iraq organized towards bases in the Arabian Gulf, is a major victory للرئيسيين Obama, Al-Maliki, stressing that the orderly withdrawal would enable Obama-a lot of papers in preparation for a second term of office for the Democrats.
In the meantime, defended a former member of the US National Security Council (ماكغورك the policy of Obama in an article published by “Washington Post” yesterday, saying: If we said things in the right way, this new phase may be more important than the withdrawal of the US troops, adding that this is not the end but the beginning of Iraq “, which will allow and normal relations between the two countries.
However, right-wing analyst Charles كراثومر said that Obama “failure” in the negotiations with the Iraqis to keep us forces in Iraq, he said in an article published by the view that Obama failed in particular “diplomatic” make the Iraqi government is willing to keep the US forces, which may result in خسارتنا of Iraq reflects the view كراثومر the opinion of many Republicans in the first place and supporters of the war in Iraq that the failure to keep us forces in Iraq, I mean, the US influence in Baghdad or to the region.
It is, without doubt, Obama, the decision to withdraw troops from Iraq was based in part on its accounts in preparation for next year’s presidential elections, especially that he promised to complete withdrawal of US forces from the country. However, the Iraqi position that refuses to give us soldiers immunity was in the end an essential not to keep military forces after the expiry of the agreement, “the US forces” in Iraq by the end of this year, which included immunity to the US forces.
Of course, the Iranian role in Iraq one of the most prominent issues that concern Americans in Iraqi-US evaluation of the relations, and this is what is Republicans, was 10 members of the Republican senators, led by the senior member of the Armed Forces Committee in the council, John McCain, sent a letter demanding to ask Obama about his decision he said the members of the upper house of parliament that withdrawal from Iraq would be seen our enemies in the Middle East, especially the Iranian regime, a strategic victory.
But officials in the US Administration does not consider the decision a victory for the neighboring countries said an official in US Department of State to “asharq Al-Awsat” that the Iraqis have proved that they do not want to interfere in Iran’s affairs, even if they are good their relations with Iran, adding there is no vacuum in Iraq because the Iraqis themselves to fill the political and military area and for his part, said the writer in “Time” magazine that the invasion of Iraq, and not leaving, in the form of a “gift” for the neighbouring countries.
Political views are reflected on perceptions of the American people on Iraq shows a poll, conducted by the Institute of “galob” this week that 75 percent of Americans support Obama’s decision to pull out of Iraq, as opposed to 21 per cent of the poll showed that 96 percent of Democrats support withdrawal from Iraq by the end of this year while 77 per cent of independents support this policy, but it is noticeable is that only 43 per cent of Republicans support withdrawal, despite the fact that the former US President George W. Bush’s Republican is the one who signed this agreement. And 52 percent of Republicans involved in the opposition for withdrawal from Iraq.
He warned the executive director of the Institute of Strategic and International Studies in the United States, Andrew باراسليتي, abuse of the consequences of the end of the war in Iraq, especially with regard to Iraq and added: We have to give the Iraqis the right, to self-determination on the basis of the Iraqi interior ministry policy, he said that the failure to reach agreement on an extension of the US forces will remain in Iraq resulted from Baghdad, not Washington, Iraq enjoying freedom now have choices.
http://bit.ly/uRYk8W