Attitudes toward foreign policy and Iraq has weakened the pr
Posted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 9:56 amAttitudes toward foreign policy and Iraq has weakened the prestige of the state
BAGHDAD (Iba) … Advisor to the Iraqi List, said Hani Ashur that the recent attitudes, contradictions and differences in the Iraqi foreign policy weakened the prestige of the state and to the international community as a country is able to identify tracks and makes the decisions of the international community does not trust the fear of dealing with it.
He said Ashour said in a statement received by the independent press (Iba) a copy of the marked difference in the attitudes of the political blocs of the Arab League’s decision to freeze the membership of Syria, and before the position of the Port Mubarak of Kuwait, and the position of the shelling Turkish and Iranian border positions, making the world a deal with Iraq as a state its decisions can not be trusted and is able to take positions that represent the state of Iraq and its people, but parties representing specific and particular interests.
He continued that one of the reasons for that is that the decisions and positions taken within the corridors of the party in control of the government without the knowledge of parliament and the discussion of such crucial decisions relating to the will of the people and attitudes about what is going on around him.
He noted that the international community in the future, and because of these differences, you will not be considered as an influential force for Iraq in its regional and international levels. And could push countries to reconsider their dealings with Iraq, in particular with respect to the conventions of political, security, economic, shall impair the prestige of the state, considering that the positions are taken in accordance with the interests of narrow partisan, can be changed in future climate policies of those parties, depending on the circumstances with them.
He Ashouran Arab League resolution last to freeze the membership of Syria revealed that Iraq is witnessing a sharp disagreements on these issues and could not agree on a common position, as well as on the construction of the port of Mubarak, who differ on it the positions of the parties and the positions of Iraqi foreign policy to the extent that differs from the position of Minister of Transport for the position of Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the position of the Council of Ministers and, before that the position of the Turkish-Iranian shelling of Iraqi border in Kurdistan, to the extent that the attitudes differ significantly allowed the parties to continue foreign Bastkhvaffha Iraqi positions and not given any consideration.
And demanded that the Supreme attitudes are discussed on important issues and Iraq’s foreign policy in the House’s decision to exit a uniform, or the establishment of the Supreme Council policy to determine the position of a unified Iraq these important issues.
The last position of Iraq to refrain from voting on the resolution to suspend the Arab Syria’s participation in the Arab League has raised varied views between the various forces and political figures.
http://bit.ly/stRbYY
BAGHDAD (Iba) … Advisor to the Iraqi List, said Hani Ashur that the recent attitudes, contradictions and differences in the Iraqi foreign policy weakened the prestige of the state and to the international community as a country is able to identify tracks and makes the decisions of the international community does not trust the fear of dealing with it.
He said Ashour said in a statement received by the independent press (Iba) a copy of the marked difference in the attitudes of the political blocs of the Arab League’s decision to freeze the membership of Syria, and before the position of the Port Mubarak of Kuwait, and the position of the shelling Turkish and Iranian border positions, making the world a deal with Iraq as a state its decisions can not be trusted and is able to take positions that represent the state of Iraq and its people, but parties representing specific and particular interests.
He continued that one of the reasons for that is that the decisions and positions taken within the corridors of the party in control of the government without the knowledge of parliament and the discussion of such crucial decisions relating to the will of the people and attitudes about what is going on around him.
He noted that the international community in the future, and because of these differences, you will not be considered as an influential force for Iraq in its regional and international levels. And could push countries to reconsider their dealings with Iraq, in particular with respect to the conventions of political, security, economic, shall impair the prestige of the state, considering that the positions are taken in accordance with the interests of narrow partisan, can be changed in future climate policies of those parties, depending on the circumstances with them.
He Ashouran Arab League resolution last to freeze the membership of Syria revealed that Iraq is witnessing a sharp disagreements on these issues and could not agree on a common position, as well as on the construction of the port of Mubarak, who differ on it the positions of the parties and the positions of Iraqi foreign policy to the extent that differs from the position of Minister of Transport for the position of Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the position of the Council of Ministers and, before that the position of the Turkish-Iranian shelling of Iraqi border in Kurdistan, to the extent that the attitudes differ significantly allowed the parties to continue foreign Bastkhvaffha Iraqi positions and not given any consideration.
And demanded that the Supreme attitudes are discussed on important issues and Iraq’s foreign policy in the House’s decision to exit a uniform, or the establishment of the Supreme Council policy to determine the position of a unified Iraq these important issues.
The last position of Iraq to refrain from voting on the resolution to suspend the Arab Syria’s participation in the Arab League has raised varied views between the various forces and political figures.
http://bit.ly/stRbYY