"The tragedy of" withdrawal from Iraq caused by Obama
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 3:54 pmAuthor: "The tragedy of" withdrawal from Iraq caused by Obama and his failure in the negotiations
01/11/2011 12:22
Beirut, November 1 (Rn) - sure writer for the "Wall Street Journal," U.S. Max Boot, that the withdrawal of Americans from Iraq was a real defeat, and mockery of what it had said the U.S. administration, "the stalled negotiations," stressing that it did not take days to seriously and "this is our failure." After the bot asks "Why do we fail?" In Iraq, he refuses to arguments that have been traded by the parties, the Iraqi and American, of the refusal by the Iraqi authorities to provide immunity for American troops remaining in Iraq in the event of breach of applicable laws. The bot that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki had expressed similar reservations about the troops' immunity in the era of former President George W. Bush in 2008, did not stop without reaching an agreement, although the number of soldiers at the time was 150 thousand, compared to 40 thousand today, why he was able to deal with the Iraqis and the inability of Obama on this? considered by the U.S., the answer very simple: "It's a matter of will, former president wanted really to hold the transaction, and was talking with al-Maliki a week by episode teleconference, at the time remained the meetings between Obama and Maliki pending for months before he calls in the past month to inform him of the end of the negotiations. so that the current U.S. president or his aides did not bother meeting with Iraqi officials in the General Assembly of the United Nations last September. " The Pot that one of the reasons for the failure of the negotiations is to delay the current administration to open the door to dialogue, as I waited until this summer to begin talks with Iraqi officials, knowing that negotiations in 2008 took more than a year before to reach agreement. On the other hand, considered the bot that the insistence of the U.S. State Department and the "Pentagon" to be approved by the Iraqi parliament to the provisions of immunity led to the collapse of negotiations, a request ignored Bush in the previous agreement, note that is rejected in all countries of the world. The author argues the U.S., the Obama administration was able to sufficiency, as did Bush, the work of its employees in Iraq under a memorandum of understanding does not require ratification from the parliament, adding "It was Obama could exceed the demands of U.S. lawmakers excessive idealism, but chose not to do. " Bot said, a writer at the Institute, "Council on Foreign Relations," American, The problem with Obama himself well, he "continues to undermine the functions of his team involved in the negotiations over the bragging in the speeches of political public that he wants to end the war in Iraq." . He Bout the worst, it was his "Summer" public-sufficient by 3000 to 5000 troops in Iraq after the deadline for their withdrawal at the end of the year, a very small number compared to what proposed by the military commanders to control the situation and maintain the achievements, where they proposed 20 000 a soldier. and see Pot the figure put forward by Obama, I am afraid the Iraqi leaders, who felt that the U.S. administration is not serious in its commitment to help Iraq, and therefore found that there is no reason to succumb to the desire of the Americans and with the reactions of local and regional versus little help, if the figure was proposed large, they will find what Asndon their backs to him, and that negotiations collapsed. He concluded Pot with reference to the possibility of cooperation between the two parties still exist within the strategic agreement signed between them, but this is not a substitute for the presence of active military in Iraq to reduce the influence of regional countries in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Iran and others, or to control the security situation is stable. The Pot that the Americans out of Iraq is part of the name of a "tragedy" and does not die for a victory in any way. From: Khalil al-Khalil. Open: Abdullah Sabri
http://www.aknews.com/ar/aknews/8/270465/
01/11/2011 12:22
Beirut, November 1 (Rn) - sure writer for the "Wall Street Journal," U.S. Max Boot, that the withdrawal of Americans from Iraq was a real defeat, and mockery of what it had said the U.S. administration, "the stalled negotiations," stressing that it did not take days to seriously and "this is our failure." After the bot asks "Why do we fail?" In Iraq, he refuses to arguments that have been traded by the parties, the Iraqi and American, of the refusal by the Iraqi authorities to provide immunity for American troops remaining in Iraq in the event of breach of applicable laws. The bot that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki had expressed similar reservations about the troops' immunity in the era of former President George W. Bush in 2008, did not stop without reaching an agreement, although the number of soldiers at the time was 150 thousand, compared to 40 thousand today, why he was able to deal with the Iraqis and the inability of Obama on this? considered by the U.S., the answer very simple: "It's a matter of will, former president wanted really to hold the transaction, and was talking with al-Maliki a week by episode teleconference, at the time remained the meetings between Obama and Maliki pending for months before he calls in the past month to inform him of the end of the negotiations. so that the current U.S. president or his aides did not bother meeting with Iraqi officials in the General Assembly of the United Nations last September. " The Pot that one of the reasons for the failure of the negotiations is to delay the current administration to open the door to dialogue, as I waited until this summer to begin talks with Iraqi officials, knowing that negotiations in 2008 took more than a year before to reach agreement. On the other hand, considered the bot that the insistence of the U.S. State Department and the "Pentagon" to be approved by the Iraqi parliament to the provisions of immunity led to the collapse of negotiations, a request ignored Bush in the previous agreement, note that is rejected in all countries of the world. The author argues the U.S., the Obama administration was able to sufficiency, as did Bush, the work of its employees in Iraq under a memorandum of understanding does not require ratification from the parliament, adding "It was Obama could exceed the demands of U.S. lawmakers excessive idealism, but chose not to do. " Bot said, a writer at the Institute, "Council on Foreign Relations," American, The problem with Obama himself well, he "continues to undermine the functions of his team involved in the negotiations over the bragging in the speeches of political public that he wants to end the war in Iraq." . He Bout the worst, it was his "Summer" public-sufficient by 3000 to 5000 troops in Iraq after the deadline for their withdrawal at the end of the year, a very small number compared to what proposed by the military commanders to control the situation and maintain the achievements, where they proposed 20 000 a soldier. and see Pot the figure put forward by Obama, I am afraid the Iraqi leaders, who felt that the U.S. administration is not serious in its commitment to help Iraq, and therefore found that there is no reason to succumb to the desire of the Americans and with the reactions of local and regional versus little help, if the figure was proposed large, they will find what Asndon their backs to him, and that negotiations collapsed. He concluded Pot with reference to the possibility of cooperation between the two parties still exist within the strategic agreement signed between them, but this is not a substitute for the presence of active military in Iraq to reduce the influence of regional countries in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Iran and others, or to control the security situation is stable. The Pot that the Americans out of Iraq is part of the name of a "tragedy" and does not die for a victory in any way. From: Khalil al-Khalil. Open: Abdullah Sabri
http://www.aknews.com/ar/aknews/8/270465/