Movements to get a UN resolution against the Iraqi governmen

[Stillw8n]

Movements to get a UN resolution against the Iraqi government and civil Iraqi lawmakers reject that

Rejected the parliamentary and legal circles of the issuance of UN resolution states that no civil government, stressing that he would be “unfortunate” as the government was elected by the Iraqi people in free and fair elections under the supervision of the United Nations.

In the meantime, a legal expert said: “The decision not to civil government should be the approval of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council approval.”
The MP for the coalition of state law, Hussein net, that “information on U.S. efforts to issue a UN resolution not to a civil government is not correct, and that this information is accurate, considering that Washington and according to the agreement signed with Baghdad will pull the end of the year of the country, have been negotiations long in this matter. “

He added that the net “There is respect for the Iraqi government and its people by the U.S. government, and that its withdrawal is being applied and will continue this withdrawal .. I do not think that there are clear from the letter of U.S. President Barak Obama on the withdrawal, I do not think the validity of this information media. “

He also stressed that “the Iraqi government was formed on the basis of free and fair elections, and that the whole world was aware of these elections, including the United Nations, which was one of the observers for the Iraqi elections, in addition to the many organizations and bodies, so there can be no dispute over the civil government .. I do not think that the United Nations issued a resolution other than this thing. “

The British official said in a press statement that States of America is seeking a UN resolution to ensure the survival of its troops in Iraq after 2011, noting that “the UN special envoy in Iraq would report the matter to the UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, and therefore, the UNAMI began the process of prepare reports on all the districts involved in human rights office at the United Nations to submit a report within three days to the United Nations and the recommendations and view what is happening in Iraq and the abuses and violations you get now will lead the country into fighting may be double what it had in 2005 and subsequent years to issue such a decision, “he says.

For his part, the MP for the Iraqi List, the appearance of al-Janabi, “Such information is not truth to it, and Americans began to actually withdraw and evacuate many of their headquarters, and they are committed to the Convention, which concluded with the Iraqi government, which provides for withdrawal in full the end of this year, despite the fact that the survival of Americans will be soon from Iraq may be in Kuwait.

He said al-Janabi, said U.S. forces will come out completely from this country and keep the Iraqi government’s relationship with the U.S. government on the basis of common interests between the two, like any other country. “

He continued: “The right of the United Nations to issue a decision not to civil government, but both issued this decision or not issued by the us confidence in ourselves and confidence of sons of our people and we will work together to build this country who no longer needs American troops.”

In turn, said the legal expert Tareq Harb said “the issuance of a resolution that the Iraqi government must be issued by the Security Council, and must be based on Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations to agree to the resolution of the five permanent members of the Security Council,” stressing that the “an attempt to issue such a decision would be a failed attempt.”

He said the war: “This issue is a” conspiracy “initiated by the Director of the Office of the UN mission in Iraq when his recent visit to Kirkuk, and that such resolution will not get approval, and that this is a breach of the Convention of Iraq – the U.S. identified the end of the current withdrawal from Iraq. “
He added by saying: “The forces entered the UN until the clothes will these forces to targeting by armed groups. Therefore, the UN would not accept such a decision, and the result that the road in front of this resolution will be closed or semi-closed. “

http://bit.ly/rYzjKA