3-14-2013 *Med
 Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:00 am
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:00 am3-14-2013  *Med     ~WE HAVE ALLOT OF NEWS...THAT I HAVE BEEN GATHERING.  ACTUALLY,  CONTACTS I HAVE HAVE COME OUT OF THE WOODWORK AND HAVE CALLED ME  THAT SOMETHING IS GOING ON BETWEEN  THE US TREASURY, THE IMF AND POSSIBLY 14  COUNTRIES INTERNATIONALLY.   NOW I KNOW WHO ARE BS SOURCES AND WHO ARE NOT THOSE WHO HELP ME OUT ARE VERY RESPONSIBLE. I, AS YOU KNOW, WONT GIVE UP THE PERSON  BUT I GOT A CALL EARLIER TODAY...AND THE BROKER TOLD THEM THAT THERE IS SOMETHING THAT MAY BE WORTHWHILE COMING UP.   IT HAD TO DO WITH AS I SAID THE IMF AND US TREASURY AND THE REVALUE OF A HUGE AMOUNT OF COUNTRIES AND ALSO THE POSSIBLE DEVALUE  OF SOME.  IRAQ WAS IN THE MIX.  THERE WAS NO VALUE GIVEN ON ANY OF THEM  BUT ALSO SOME U.S. BANKS  HAVE BEEN PRIVY TO THIS FOR SOME TIME  BUT FOR SOME REASON, AS IN IRAQ ISSUES, CAME UP TO POSTPONE IT.   THEY HAVE EVEN PUT OUT GRAPHS AND CHARTS  ON THE COUNTRIES AT CERTAIN BANKS AND ARE CONFIDENTIAL. MUCH OF THIS DOES REVOLVE AROUND CHINA.  CHINA WANTS TO TAKE OVER IRAQ, NOT IN A MILITARY WAY BUT AS IN OIL EXPORTS.  NO COUNTRY  THAT HAS A THRIVING ECONOMY AND THE PEOPLE ARE WORKING  DOESNT NOT HAVE A TRADEABLE CURRENCY, IT IS COMMON SENSE AND BASIC ECONOMICS.  IN ORDER TO DO BUSINESS WITH THE U.S. THAT CURRENCY HAS TO BE ONE THAT ANY EXPORTER CAN CASH IN AND I AM NOT TALKING PHYSICAL CASH  IT CAN BE A BANK TRANSFER  BUT IT STILL HAS TO BE BACKED.    I NEVER WAS A RAH RAH BUT I REALLY FEEL GREAT ABOUT THIS.