28/01/2012 22:20
Beirut, January 28 January (Rn) - I tried the "New York Times," U.S., answer the question based on whether Israel will attack Iran, and if unable to do so, recalling the experience of the Israeli assault on the Iraqi nuclear reactor in the eighties . in an extensive report written by Ronen Bergman, an analyst in the newspaper "Yedioth Ahronoth," Israel and author of "The Secret War with Iran," noted, "New York Times" to the Bergman met political figures large, including Israeli Prime Minister and intelligence officers in the Mossad and the CIA " the CIA. " The "New York Times that" a successful attack would not destroy the scientific expertise owned by the scholars of the Iranian nuclear project, and it is possible that Iran, and taking into account the infrastructure technology is very sophisticated, you will be able to rebuild the areas that are destroyed in a possible Israeli attack. " The newspaper pointed out in their conclusions that "other than Syria, which has not yet responded to the destruction of its nuclear reactor in 2007, the" Iran openly declared that it would respond with ferocity when it is exposed to attack, "adding that" Iran has hundreds of missiles " Shihab, "armed with warheads that can reach Israel, and they can be harnessed Hezbollah to hit Israeli towns their rockets by the 50 thousand rockets, some of which can be up to Tel Aviv." But the paper pointed out that "the Israeli Air Force has aircraft has capacity long-range and capable of reaching deep into Iran, in addition to a number of drones capable of carrying bombs to those goals and has the ability to stay in the air for up to 48 hours. " After the newspaper gave to the above that the said former Mossad chief Gen. Meir Dagan, the results of an attack on Iran would be catastrophic, the movement for Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, the questions and described as "pivotal", is "Does Israel have the capacity to cause serious damage sites of Iran's nuclear and cause a significant delay in the Iranian nuclear project? Could the army Israelis and steadfastness in the face of the counter-attack which is inevitable? Does Israel have the public support and implicit, especially by the United States to carry out the attack? Do exhausted all other possibilities to contain the Iranian nuclear threat, and so Israel has reached the point of last resort? Is this the last chance for the attack? . then you should Barak, saying that since the emergence of the Iranian nuclear threat in the mid-nineties, some of the strongest leaders of Israel, believe that the answer to all these questions is "yes." the newspaper quoted Barak as saying that he is not the only concern that the operations of the Mossad secret, side side with the international sanctions against Iran, will not be enough to deter Tehran, noting that three senior officers of military intelligence, told him that in spite of attempts Dagan slow down the Iranian nuclear program, Iran continues to make significant progress. The newspaper said that one of these officers said operations of Israel against the Iraqi nuclear program in the late seventies, when he managed the Mossad from the liquidation of some of the scientists working in the project and intimidate others. It explained that on the night of April 6 1979, entered a team of Mossad agents to port the French city of La Seine-sur-Mer, and blew up the shipment for the cooling system the Iraqi reactor, which was being manufactured in France. She said the French police were unable to find the perpetrators of this process, also announced the organization is known to the defense of the environment, claimed responsibility for the incident. The newspaper said that "the attack was successful, but after one year was to repair the damage and thwarted efforts to sabotage the other, and the progress of this project until late 1980, when he discovered that he had been sent a shipment of fuel rods containing enriched uranium from France to Baghdad, and they were about to feed the reactor core. " and went on to say, according to Israeli version that Israel felt it had no option but to launch the "Opera", which is an air raid a surprise in June 1981 on the Osirak reactor outside Baghdad. The newspaper added, "Similarly, critics say, Dagan, said the Iranians were able to overcome most of setbacks and the replacement of the scientists who were murdered others, and that according to the latest information, Iran has now about ten thousand centrifuges operating effectively, it is also Iran has currently five tons of fissile material from low-grade which is insufficient when converted to high-quality materials for the manufacture of about five to six bombs. " The paper quotes Barak as saying about the goal that Iran is seeking to achieve by obtaining a nuclear weapon, "the Iranian bomb to ensure the survival of the current system, and without which no system can mullahs of the celebration of the 40th anniversary of the revolution in the light of admiration for his the young generation in Iran to the West, "in reference to protests of Iran, which came after the presidential election in 2009. He concluded, Barak, in his remarks to the newspaper the U.S., saying that "in the moment in which they become a nuclear Iran, will be the other countries in the region have to do the the same Saudis Declare it explicitly and told Americans that, and one can think in both Turkey and Egypt in this context, not to mention the risk associated with the manufacture of such weapons as could be leaking weapons and raw materials to manufacture to terrorist groups. " quoted analyst in his report " New York Times, "a security source as a major Israeli displeasure with the position of the U.S. administration, where he says that" the Americans are telling us that the time is still early for Iran to produce nuclear weapons, and we tell them that they have between six to nine months, and therefore and for the depletion of this path, the sanctions must acknowledge and do immediately. " Khalil al-Khalil, the Open: Joseph Karwan
http://www.aknews.com/ar/aknews/7/286862/
